After months of chatting with the same AI sidekick, even the most helpful assistant can start to feel a little stale and predictable. If you’ve been relying on ChatGPT to write emails, generate grocery lists, spin up vacation itineraries, or explain music lyrics, you may have encountered that peculiar sort of digital fatigue. So if you’re feeling a little restless when it comes to AI assistants, maybe you should try Google Gemini as your rebound chatbot.
The differences between ChatGPT and Gemini may seem cosmetic, like Coke vs. Pepsi. But spend a little time interacting with Gemini and you’ll notice a lot more than just a different company sucking up all your data.
Gemini isn’t just “Google’s ChatGPT.” It’s a fully multimodal, deeply integrated AI assistant that now sits not only in its own chat interface but inside Chrome, Android, Workspace, and more. It’s ambitious, sometimes idiosyncratic, and with the latest Gemini 2.5 models, it’s gunning for a seat at the table with OpenAI’s heavyweights.
For starters, while ChatGPT has a huge database to draw on, Gemini has the distinct advantage of knowing everything Google knows. Real-time information is built in, and it stays up to date without the need for clever prompt engineering.
Google’s Gemini also brings something to the table that ChatGPT still fumbles with: native file and media understanding. You can drop in PDFs, Docs, or image files and get answers without extra steps. It’s great for annotating screenshots and summarizing research papers alike.
If you paste in a 40-page PDF or share your Google Docs folder, Gemini can help you synthesize insights, compare chapters, or answer detailed questions referencing parts far apart. ChatGPT can do that too (especially in its more premium tiers), but Gemini leans harder into that as a native strength rather than an add-on.
Multimodal major
One of ChatGPT’s limitations is its relative weakness with non-text modalities (though newer versions have improved). Gemini, by design, is multimodal: you can feed it images, ask it to analyze them, generate art, or use its voice interface, Gemini Live. Its image generation is backed by Nano Banana, Google’s new internal image model, giving Gemini a native path from prompt to image.
If you show Gemini a photo of a cluttered room and ask, “Remodel this into a minimalist workspace,” it can annotate, suggest design variants, or even generate mockups. ChatGPT’s image capabilities tend to be more siloed or reliant on external plugins. In audio, Gemini now supports uploading audio files for analysis of up to 10 minutes on free tiers, giving it an advantage for transcriptions, podcast scripts, or analyzing recorded interviews.
Gemini benefits from Google on an aesthetic level as well. Gemini’s design ethos feels less like a lab experiment grown wild and more like the polished products developed over many years by Google. It can feel like a breath of fresh air.
Then there’s the ecosystem. OpenAI’s ChatGPT has become a hub for tools, plugins, and features like custom GPTs, memory, and voice chat. If you’ve already built your workflow around its Agent tools or personal AI profiles, Gemini may feel barebones by comparison, at least for now. Google is clearly gearing up to expand Gemini’s capabilities, but for users deeply entrenched in the ChatGPT ecosystem, the transition won’t be as seamless.
Ask Gemini to “Find a dog‑friendly café nearby, map it, message my friend with the address, and add it to my calendar,” and it will orchestrate actions across Maps, messaging, and calendars. ChatGPT sometimes achieves this via plugins or external APIs, but it can take longer.
Gemini value
Gemini’s integration with Google can be appealing, but it also draws some valid criticism. You might be concerned about how data flows between your conversations and your Google account. And while Google maintains that Gemini interactions are protected and private, anyone familiar with the semi-regular apologies from tech companies over missteps and data leaks might find this pairing worrying.
The caveats don’t detract from the conclusion that Gemini is worth trying. It’s fast. It’s precise. It respects your time and rarely makes you repeat yourself. That alone gives it real appeal for people who just want AI to work. Pretty much everything ChatGPT can do, Gemini can match or even exceed. You won’t be alone in trying Gemini, either. Gemini’s total visits increased by 46% since August 2025. While chatbots remain a loyalty game, the momentum shift is notable.
If you’ve spent the past year glued to ChatGPT, it’s understandable to feel reluctant to turn to an alternative. The irritants may be small or rare enough to make the prospect of starting over feel like too much work. But it’s important to remember that options exist and may have their own strengths. And perhaps you could do with a change of pace in AI, if only for a while.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
Add Comment